RE: Cosby Sentence
October 4, 2018 at 11:27 am
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2018 at 11:36 am by Huggy Bear.)
(October 4, 2018 at 9:09 am)OakTree500 Wrote:(October 4, 2018 at 3:43 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Incase you haven't been paying attention, I've been saying there isn't any evidence, not about to go looking for something nonexistent.
How do you know it doesn't exist if you haven't looked for it?
Because all I have to do is look at why the jurors said they convicted him to know there was no evidence of any rape.
Juror says Bill Cosby's own words led to his conviction
Quote:Harrison Snyder, in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America" that aired Monday, said he believed Constand's claim that Cosby assaulted her in 2004 at his home in a Philadelphia suburb.
And, Snyder, said, the testimony of five other accusers who testified was not necessary for the conviction. "I don't think it really necessarily mattered that these five other women were here because he said it himself -- that he used drugs for other women," Snyder told "GMA."
So this Jurors believes he was guilty because he gave drugs to women who took them of their own free will, remember this was in the 70's, it has NOTHING to do with Constand which occured in 2004. Also in that very same deposition he stated he never had sex with Constand.
![[Image: yf55fbl.png]](https://i.imgur.com/yf55fbl.png)
So basically the Juror believes he was guilty based on what happened in the 70's, long past the statute of limitations. If the deposition is what broke the camels back, then what actual evidence could they possibly of had?
Also
Cosby lawyers ask for juror to be removed
Quote:One of the jurors selected this week for Bill Cosby's sexual assault retrial should be removed for making a comment indicating the TV icon is guilty, according to defense lawyers. They say it shows the juror may not be fair and impartial. A motion filed late Friday afternoon says the man, who was elected as Juror 11, said, "I just think he's guilty, so we can all be done and get out of here," during the jury selection process.
This particular Juror believed he was guilty before the trial even started...
This is for those who don't don't think race played any part of this trial, From the same link above.
Quote:If juror number 11 is removed, replacing him with an alternate could change the racial makeup of the jury. Right now, the main jury panel includes two African-Americans. If the juror, who is white, is replaced with the first alternate, who is black, there would then be three African-Americans on the jury.
(October 4, 2018 at 10:52 am)Crossless2.0 Wrote:(October 4, 2018 at 10:44 am)Huggy74 Wrote: I guess it's lost in you that Hitler declared the Japanese honorary Aryans.
![]()
You forgot the Finns, the Arabs, and even a few Jews.
So you agree with my point then? you don't have to be white to be a white supremacist...