Cosby Sentence

[Huggy Bear]

You're comparing apples and oranges.

Kids have no choice in having to deal with family members.

I see no reason why grown ass adult who was raped by someone she was acquainted with would continue to contact this person after the fact, especially every valentines day. That's seems to be behavior consistent with a consensual relationship.

If not then how else do you expect one to prove consent 18 years after the fact?

You know you can be raped in a consensual relationship, right? You know you can have Stockholm Syndrome, low self-esteem, lack of intelligence and any number of other qualities that lead you to continue contact with your assailant? My ex punched me, picked my up by my neck and body-slammed me, literally ripped a door off its hinges and threw it at me, intimidated me constantly, cheated on me, gaslit me, and so on. I stayed with him for 10 years. The many and varied reasons are none of anyone's business and do not at all diminish what happened. He's still guilty of everything he did. Me making a phone call one or 100 times does not at all change a single damn thing about it. Sexual abuse is no different. I know women personally who stay in contact with men who've sexually assaulted them. I say women because there are about a handful of them that I know of. I don't have a lot of close friends, Huggy. That should tell you how common it is for a person to stay in contact with an abuser. It's a known psychological phenomenon.

Huggy, you do not understand what you're talking about. He may or may not be guilty, but you clearly don't know anything about how victim's behave and maybe should find another angle to argue your point. This angle is not a good one. It's not logical.

Again, we aren't talking about the same thing. Emotional and physical abuse I get, but the Cosby case is not that.

Constand DID contact the police but before she contacted police she was already searching for a lawyer who specialized in sexual assault lawsuits, not to mention she's contradicting all types of testimony she gave to the police initially. Generally when someone is telling the truth, their story remains consistent.

So again, if we're just going to abandon all reason when it comes to allegations of sexual assault, how is one suppose to defend themselves, especially 18 years later? Not to mention the fact that no one can point to one shred of evidence that was presented in the case that proves Cosby raped Constand.

If we can't judge her based on her actions, can we judge her based on her testimony?