(October 8, 2018 at 11:30 am)Bob Kelso Wrote:(October 8, 2018 at 11:03 am)Huggy74 Wrote: But it's not 'some', and i'm not putting words in your mouth, it's the only logical conclusion.*my emphasis*
Hardly, taking more than a few seconds to think about my word choice would lead you to more than one. I used the term equate specifically, because a person’s sexual organs don’t translate into their understanding of a topic.
I got that part...
But what YOU don't seem to be getting is that this isn't some random topic, it's a topic that involve and affect women. If the MAJORITY of that group feel a certain way about an issue that concerns THEM, who am I to tell them that their organs don't translate into understanding the topic?
(October 8, 2018 at 11:30 am)Bob Kelso Wrote:Yes.Quote:a majority of one specific group of women voted for a person who admitted to sexually assaulting women, and now just nominated a supreme court justice which may result in roe v wade being overturned.
So either this majority of women had no understanding, or they're getting exactly what they wanted.
Are you suggesting that these two things are mutually exclusive?
If you don't have any understanding then you cannot make an informed decision.