(October 8, 2018 at 10:12 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: 1. If you have heard our arguments and found them convincing, consider we have heard your rebuttals and found them unconvincing.
2. If we have the burden proof, you have the burden to accept the proof if proven to you or show that the burden has not been met.
3. God by definition is the most important being, if an approach to this is made by jest and his scriptures approached with no seriousness, then whether he exists or not, forgive Theists for seeing it irrational and evil to belittle what by definition most revered being in existence.
4. It won't ever make sense that hating goodness for what is: is irrelevant to morality and hence, if goodness is God's light that hating that mystic link, would be hating for what it is at it's heart.
5. When we value beings, we value the value in them, if you hate value being linked to God, and value is linked to God, do you hate or love true value of things or do you just make up what value is and attribute to them...try to understand not only the issue of God existence is of vital importance then to love and appreciating and empathy, but that truly to act for the face of God in all things requires to recognize the face of God and his word of light brought to life.
6. I can't take your testification that you are honest and truly assess all evidence seriously - in light of how you guys have display an attitude to dialogue over the years. You chose to be silly. And hence, your testification has become meaningless to me as far as these issues go.
1. I doubt that anyone here has found your arguments convincing. The number of AF members who have converted to Islam based on what you have to say can be counted on the fingers of one thumb.
2. But you haven't yet offered any proof, nor even any evidence. All we get from you is arguments so circular that they resemble nothing so much as a carousel on PCP.
3. Contradiction. You - in the same sentence - admit the possibility that God may not exist, then the 'most revered being in existence.' Can't have it both ways.
4. I don't understand your sentence construction (huge shock, I know).
5. I'm pretty sure I can value value without linking it to God. Further, you've yet to show that God has values that I should value.
6. Does this mean you're going to stop preaching at us?
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax