Silly Atheists.

[I_am_not_mafia]

1. If you have heard our arguments and found them convincing, consider we have heard your rebuttals and found them unconvincing.

Are you sure you meant to say this? If we found your arguments convincing (we don't) then why would we be rebutting them?

Or this is the usual theist assumption that we're just angry at your non-existent god?

2. If we have the burden proof, you have the burden to accept the proof if proven to you or show that the burden has not been met.

In which case you're also arguing that theists have a burden to accept the proof given to them as to why they are wrong, at least the scientific evidence. They hardly ever do. Certainly not the theists on this site.

3.  God by definition is the most important being,

Your definition. Everyone who believes in a god has a different idea of what their god is. This is because there is no single definition. Indeed the god concept is meant to be undefinable. Because if it could be defined then it wouldn't be a god, it would be something else.

if an approach to this is made by jest

Three gods walk into a bar ...