RE: California Requires Women on Corp Boards by law.
October 9, 2018 at 7:01 pm
(This post was last modified: October 9, 2018 at 7:23 pm by Dr H.)
(October 6, 2018 at 12:50 pm)Tres Leches Wrote: I don't see how this relates to the new California law for placing women on corporate boards.It relates to Rob's point that there can be cases in which forcing a quota does more harm than good, if there aren't applicants available to meet a particular quota.
Quote:A law which, by the way, doesn't require boards to be populated 50% by women.Um... yes it does:
"No later than the close of the 2021 calendar year, the bill would increase that required minimum number to 2 female directors if the corporation has 5 directors or to 3 female directors if the corporation has 6 or more directors."
Two out of five is 40%; three out of six is 50%.
Quote:It's not a zero sum game.I don't disagree with that.
Women have been purposefully kept out of a number of arenas in the US for generations. Often with the complicity of many women themselves, sadly.
Quote:My point stands. It's too bad that a law has to be passed and society won't change on its own volition but if that's what it takes to break through inequality, so be it.And my point stands -- passing a law won't fix this; it rarely ever does.
(October 6, 2018 at 9:34 pm)Grandizer Wrote: There's no easy solution, I agree. But the system is flawed, and it's going to take aeons before this gets fixed in a natural manner (i.e., without a fight).So, fight.
Major social change comes about through social movements, not through working within the system that is already stacked against you.
Quote:Why not gradually address aspects of it until the whole system has been revamped properly?Because the system will never get revamped in that way. It's bailing a sinking ship with a leaky cup, when what is needed in a new ship.
That said, there's nothing wrong with trying to use all available means to try to effect change.
It's just something of a waste of effort to use a less effective means, when more effective means are available.
Quote:Why continue fostering sexist attitudes against women, especially when the rationale for such mindset isn't warranted?Passing a law rarely changes any attitudes or mindsets.
Look at Prohibition, or the Civil Rights Act.
--
Dr H
"So, I became an anarchist, and all I got was this lousy T-shirt."
Dr H
"So, I became an anarchist, and all I got was this lousy T-shirt."