Evidence for a god. Do you have any? Simplified arguments version.

[GrandizerII]

The whole thing remains an effect by induction that we can apply parts to the whole, just as we do with any series of lines.

Again, it's like saying 100 pounds is heavy, 1000 pounds is heavy, infinite pounds is not heavy, makes no sense.

Yes, arguing from part to whole is not always a fallacy, correct. But sometimes it is.

In the case of the infinity of a line vs. the "finity" of its individual points, it is a fallacy to say the line must be finite because its points are "finite".