(October 13, 2018 at 5:26 am)Huggy74 Wrote:So Harvey had a sixteen year old lover. Sixteen is the age of consent here so I don't have an issue with that.(October 13, 2018 at 5:06 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: All I knew about Harvey Milk was that he was famously gay. I knew nothing of the claims of sexual abuse, which don't seem to be supported by a conviction.If all you knew about Harvey Milk was that he was gay, why did you link to an article speaking on him being a sexual predator?
Huggy on the other hand goes out of his way to excuse a convicted rapist. This seem to be a trend of American Christians lately and I though I'd point it out.
Huggy does go on these strange non-sequesters when defending his bizarre stances.
Or did you not read past the headline?
Which means you're eithier stupid or a liar...
Harvey Milk had a 16 year old lover, THAT FACT IS INDISPUTABLE.
I mean, damn, Rev. Rye just linked to a book detailing this.
If it is indisputable that he had a 16 year old lover then it is also indisputable that he was guilty of statutory rape.
Your denial of those facts is very telling.
He wasn't convicted of being a sexual predator and his Wikipedia page says nothing about it.
This seems to be more about your shock at men having sex with men and defending using drugs to rape women, which you seem to be fine with.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvey_Milk
This is where I know Milk from.
In summation your attitudes and opinions are full of misogyny and homophobia, a typical US Christian.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.