RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any? Simplified arguments version.
October 13, 2018 at 2:11 pm
1. Morality is true guidance.
2. If we decided morality, humans would be the source of guidance.
3. Humans and ourselves included aren't reliable means of determining guidance for ourselves or others.
4. If Humans aren't a reliable source of guidance, so aren't other sentient beings who don't have proof for their guidance to be reliable.
5. The only reliable source of guidance is that which has proof of their guidance.
6. If a human or sentient being were to have reliable guidance, it would be due to being guided by something other then beings without proof of their guidance.
7. The only reliable guidance possible is from the absolute being which never misguides or errs and guides to the truth and hence guides who guide others, require to prove they are upon guidance of this being.
8. True morality exists.
9. Therefore reliable guidance exists.
10. Therefore God exists.
This also happens to refute deism and prove religion is needed.
2. If we decided morality, humans would be the source of guidance.
3. Humans and ourselves included aren't reliable means of determining guidance for ourselves or others.
4. If Humans aren't a reliable source of guidance, so aren't other sentient beings who don't have proof for their guidance to be reliable.
5. The only reliable source of guidance is that which has proof of their guidance.
6. If a human or sentient being were to have reliable guidance, it would be due to being guided by something other then beings without proof of their guidance.
7. The only reliable guidance possible is from the absolute being which never misguides or errs and guides to the truth and hence guides who guide others, require to prove they are upon guidance of this being.
8. True morality exists.
9. Therefore reliable guidance exists.
10. Therefore God exists.
This also happens to refute deism and prove religion is needed.
