RE: Cosby Sentence
October 14, 2018 at 7:39 pm
(This post was last modified: October 14, 2018 at 8:14 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(October 14, 2018 at 1:24 pm)Joods Wrote:(October 14, 2018 at 11:20 am)Huggy74 Wrote:
So let me get this straight.
Are you and Judy saying that if a person commits a crime but is not convicted he should get a pass?
LOL Figures that'd be the takeaway you got from what we said.
I think we're done here because either you're intentionally being obtuse or you really are this fucking stupid.
(October 14, 2018 at 11:54 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Not really, I stated that if Cosby was a gay man, DBP would be defending him. As you can see, I wasn't wrong.
But he's not gay so the fact that you again, try to spin something out of the air that has NOTHING to do with the PD of this thread, is just incredible.
First - you get your panties in a twist because the victim won and you felt he didn't get a fair trial due to the fact that you didn't like the evidence that was presented.
Then you try, as usual, to play the race card.
There was zero evidence presented as it relates to the Constand case, you guys have yet to name one example.
But as it relates to the Justice system and fairness I'll quote a highly regarded atheist intellectual:
Since Cosby's case just happens to be in Pennsylvania, I'll defer to this persons opinion of the corrupt judicial system there...
(October 14, 2018 at 1:24 pm)Joods Wrote: When that didn't work, you took a totally unrelated an rather irrelevant post of DBP's that you decided to quote mine out of context, that had fuck all to do with Cosby or any of his accusers, and attempted to spin it into this thread. I'm not even going to address what you quote mined of mine. We all know you'll just keep on getting away with it. Whatever. The point is that several of us wasted many pages calling you out and telling you how off the mark you are with bringing up an example that had nothing to do with Cosby and wasn't even in the same realm of reality as Cosby's trial.*emphasis mine*
Technically - you should have received at the least, a temporary ban for doing that since it's against the rules to take posts out of context and you've done it a few times before, but oh well. You get to stay and play on the playground for whatever reasons. And no - that's not a dig at staff. It's just frustrating to see you skirt the rules so well that your quote mining is constantly subject to opinion-based decisions and not based on the fact that yes, you do in fact, break the quote mining rule here. You've become a professional at pissing people off while staying right under the line. Bravo!
I took a SCREENSHOT of Downbeatplumb's post, which was the first post of the thread (seeing how he started it). HTF is that out of context?
People should probably get temp bans for false accusations of breaking rules.