Love values love above all things.
Acts of love are loved, but by what? By love.
Circular reference to itself is always wrong to justify, but in case of love it iterates itself constantly. It's like while (true) loop in programming. It never will disbelieve in itself being justified in some regards, and will believe in acts of love, no matter what.
It knows we have value, because are instances of love. The greater we in love, the greater we are. All branches come through it.
It not only asses all morals and sees them for what they when people do them, but through a limited perception of it, the beauty of nature is within it's grasp.
Paintings are all assessed by it's love of beauty. Mathematics and how people speak, so the many hues of culture and language, are all perceived by it.
It knows everything already, so when it sees something, it's reminded of what is and assesses it.
Every information that it downloads is but a reminder it already knew and hence it assess it.
It knows the taste of Lasagna and Vanilla Ice cream.
It knows the taste of speghatti.
And it knows the value of friendships.
It knows what a mother is, what a father is, what a brother is, what a sister is, and not only that, but the particular ones we have.
It's not valuer by whims, but by truth.
That truth and it's source, to me, is God.
He makes us laugh and cry.
And I fear my dark sins and know the day of judgment through realization that he hates the opposite of love, which is envy.
Hate is an application of love or hate is an application of envy.
If it's from the envious eye - it's from the forbidden tree, and it's from the idolization of oneself through false vision.
I believe in my creation in truth, because I believe in love, and I believe love needs to be guided, and so I believe God will establish a link to him, that if we hold on to by love, it will make us see through love what we need to see and will guide us to the springs of his love in higher states.
Love has to be the unseen eye to God.
If love doesn't see God, then yes, God would not exist, there would be no being worthy of Worship as far as we know.
But it sees it through various veils, in all things, everything manifests God to some degree, even it's parable of being what he is not.
We talk about morals, and not love. Every moral act must be an act of love.
Otherwise morality for the sake of morality, it's just meaningless ego seeking drive.
We have to love people for the good in them and love people for their potential, and even if a person is lost and evil, we have to love by compassion for them even when he are disgusted by who they are.
Love needs guidance, and love that acts chaotically without guidance, will find itself confused and lost.
I hate all moral discussions as if moral laws apply to us like some law we must follow, rather, they are all dictated by language of love. Love has limits it must not cross, it has ways of destruction it must protect itself against, and there is misleading ways.
Love already knows what is to be valued most by definition, and if it didn't it would be false. Love is not based on imagination but reality.
It values is based on truth and this includes the highest possible definition of what it ought to value and love the most.
Acts of love are loved, but by what? By love.
Circular reference to itself is always wrong to justify, but in case of love it iterates itself constantly. It's like while (true) loop in programming. It never will disbelieve in itself being justified in some regards, and will believe in acts of love, no matter what.
It knows we have value, because are instances of love. The greater we in love, the greater we are. All branches come through it.
It not only asses all morals and sees them for what they when people do them, but through a limited perception of it, the beauty of nature is within it's grasp.
Paintings are all assessed by it's love of beauty. Mathematics and how people speak, so the many hues of culture and language, are all perceived by it.
It knows everything already, so when it sees something, it's reminded of what is and assesses it.
Every information that it downloads is but a reminder it already knew and hence it assess it.
It knows the taste of Lasagna and Vanilla Ice cream.
It knows the taste of speghatti.
And it knows the value of friendships.
It knows what a mother is, what a father is, what a brother is, what a sister is, and not only that, but the particular ones we have.
It's not valuer by whims, but by truth.
That truth and it's source, to me, is God.
He makes us laugh and cry.
And I fear my dark sins and know the day of judgment through realization that he hates the opposite of love, which is envy.
Hate is an application of love or hate is an application of envy.
If it's from the envious eye - it's from the forbidden tree, and it's from the idolization of oneself through false vision.
I believe in my creation in truth, because I believe in love, and I believe love needs to be guided, and so I believe God will establish a link to him, that if we hold on to by love, it will make us see through love what we need to see and will guide us to the springs of his love in higher states.
Love has to be the unseen eye to God.
If love doesn't see God, then yes, God would not exist, there would be no being worthy of Worship as far as we know.
But it sees it through various veils, in all things, everything manifests God to some degree, even it's parable of being what he is not.
We talk about morals, and not love. Every moral act must be an act of love.
Otherwise morality for the sake of morality, it's just meaningless ego seeking drive.
We have to love people for the good in them and love people for their potential, and even if a person is lost and evil, we have to love by compassion for them even when he are disgusted by who they are.
Love needs guidance, and love that acts chaotically without guidance, will find itself confused and lost.
I hate all moral discussions as if moral laws apply to us like some law we must follow, rather, they are all dictated by language of love. Love has limits it must not cross, it has ways of destruction it must protect itself against, and there is misleading ways.
Love already knows what is to be valued most by definition, and if it didn't it would be false. Love is not based on imagination but reality.
It values is based on truth and this includes the highest possible definition of what it ought to value and love the most.