Subjective Morality?

[DLJ]

...
Isn't the purpose of morality to rationally distinguish between good and bad actions?
...

Nope. (Depending upon how one defines morality) it's purpose is to emotionally distinguish between good and bad feelings.

It's about competence not comprehension.

And welcome to the forum.

It's an oxymoron.

Nope. It's a tautology.

...
I spot a chance to chime in with my pet peeve...

A lot of times when people say "objective" they seem to mean "universal and eternal." As if any objective judgment will be the same always and forever. But I don't think that's what "objective" means. 
...

My pet peeve too.

There was a notable moment in the W. Lane Craig / Hitchens debate when the latter observed that the former had dropped his usual favourite adjective in favour of a new one... 'absolute' was out and 'objective' was in.

If even christian apologists have dropped the idea of 'absolute morality', that's progress.