(October 19, 2018 at 9:21 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:(October 19, 2018 at 7:29 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: It is not a "code". It is nothing but chemistry and chemical bonds. It was not 'designed". It evolved. Your video is shit.
Your lame attempt to excuse why it does not appear to be "perfect' is nothing but rationalization.
A perfect being could NOT design anything imperfect. There is no evidence .... NOT ONE shred, that the design was at ANY point ever "perfect" .... BEFORE the "fall".
Therefore your paradigm is false. There NEVER was perfection BEFORE the fall, and the universe ALWAYS operated THE SAME as it does now.
You have no evidence of preternatural perfection. You have no evidence of a "fall", and your "code" is bullshit. You know NO chemistry. You are an ignorant fool.
Dinosaurs got cancer. Millions of years before any human walked the Earth, (therefore BEFORE any possible "fall" (LOL).....) the universe was "fallen".
So much for that crap.
https://www.nature.com/news/2003/031021/...020-2.html
OP may or may not be a troll. But he has distanced himself from fundamentalism enough that the argument about the literal date of "the Fall" does not apply here.
Don't be stupid. If the universe is "fallen" then it actually "happened" at some point, and BEFORE that point, it was not fallen. There is no evidence at all of a non-fallen universe. HE used the concept ... doesn't matter when it happened. The use of the word "fallen" means there actually was a transition form something to another thing. The entire thing is bogus.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist