(October 20, 2018 at 12:56 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(October 20, 2018 at 12:32 pm)CDF47 Wrote: I appreciate not getting banned. I am not trolling here at all. I know it gets a bit repetitive because my main point stands the same which I believe is proof of a designer. I keep having to defend that main point.
The arguments you put forward for your main point were comprehensively refuted and yet you didn't add anything new, just kept banging on at the same old stuff.
DNA does not prove or imply a designer.
For example you do not go on to say how the designer designed its design. What was its process? where did it get the materials? etc etc etc.
Show us a truly worked out and evidenced argument as to how it did it and perhaps we'll revisit. At the moment all you say is "I dunno how it happened so it must be magic man".
It's classic "god of the gaps" thinking with an unhealthy dose of gish gallop, argument from ignorance, non-sequitur, unevidenced assertion, argument from authority...
If we had a logical fallacy bingo card going, somebody would have had a win hundreds of posts ago.
