(October 23, 2018 at 8:08 pm)Khemikal Wrote:(October 23, 2018 at 7:42 pm)bennyboy Wrote: That's not how I see it. I see moral objectivism as the idea that there are MORAL facts, i.e. moral ideas which are true whether people think so or not. There aren't, though very many people have claimed their moral flavor-of-the-time to be so. There are physical facts, and subjective interpretations of their meaning and importance.Read the bolded again, with your own comments set right alongside. Yes, moral realists contend that there are (or at least could be) moral facts. Subjectivism denies this.
Right. I deny that there are moral facts. I will say only that there are physical facts upon which a subjective morality draws in establishing the complex of feelings and ideas which, taken as a whole, represent a moral system.
