Possibly restricting photo sizes?

[Rev. Rye]

I see imgfit as a good solution for images that are wider than your device's image resolution (1366 pixels, in my case). Not for small ones that are likely to cause pixelation, then you just use "img".

Small according to what?  My screen size, your iphone screen, my tablet screen, whose screen is your advice tailored to?

My screen resolution is 1900x1080 -- I don't see images that are wider than my device's image resolution very often.  I don't think you're thinking about anyone's situation but your own.  You aren't the only one using the forum, you know.  If imgfit shrunk images but didn't enlarge them, then you'd have a point.  But it doesn't.

I'm just going by my own experience. Images smaller than that browser resolution (or, indeed, ones that the browser doesn't resize to fit the screen and ask you to click again to see it at full size) just don't need it. There's just no point. I just work under the two-sizes fits all approach, where large images use imgfit, and smaller images use img. If you're looking for a one-size approach, I simply don't see the point, unless you want needlessly-stretched-out images or images that are big enough they fuck with the rest of the thread.