(November 5, 2018 at 11:01 am)CDF47 Wrote:(November 5, 2018 at 9:42 am)Bucky Ball Wrote: You must quote a geneticist (scientist). You have no authority or knowledge of the subject.
Scientists in general do not accept the bullshit.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/9452500/ns/tec...nt-design/
Behe told the "Dover" court that Astrology was science. (LOL)
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8...room-told/
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Kitzmille...Is_Science
Behe admitted he has nothing.
https://sensuouscurmudgeon.wordpress.com...no-theory/
You know SO little about the subject you PRETEND to go on about, you cannot refute ONE thing in the actual chemistry of this Nobel Laureate :
WHy is it you are unable to define "complexity" and tell us what is or is not "complex enough" to require a designer.
You are unable to state at what point in increasing complexity, a designer becomes necessary.
Explain in detail, (chemically) why a crystalline lattice does NOT require a designer.
Or do they ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_structure
If your bs has any merit, you will be able to tell us where the complexity boundary is crossed to "designer is necessary", and why structures simpler that the boundary you will propose do not need a designer.
75 % of our DNA is junk, after all.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/214...after-all/
What possible good would DNA from Neanderthals do for humans ?
https://knpr.org/npr/2017-10/neanderthal...acEALw_wcB
When there is complex functional information there is a designer. It is found in the DNA molecule.
You have answered NONE of the questions. You have not defined "complex functional information".
Assertions without support are dismissed for the nonsense they are. You have provided no support.
You were asked about a boundary. Why can't you answer the question ?
The formulas which define the orbits of multiple complex celestial objects/systems, the probability algorithms of Quantum Mechanics are "complex functional information". Are these formulas or motions designed ?
The fact is your definition commits the "post hoc" and "regression" fallacies.
You actually blew your wadd for ANY credibility when you said the universe was chaotic, and there was no reason to see the order which is observed.
Answer ALL the questions. Every question which remains unanswered demonstrates the falsehood of the ID nonsense.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
