RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 5, 2018 at 11:58 am
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2018 at 12:03 pm by Bucky Ball.)
(November 5, 2018 at 11:49 am)CDF47 Wrote:(November 5, 2018 at 11:32 am)Bucky Ball Wrote: You have answered NONE of the questions. You have not defined "complex functional information".
Assertions without support are dismissed for the nonsense they are. You have provided no support.
You were asked about a boundary. Why can't you answer the question ?
The formulas which define the orbits of multiple complex celestial objects/systems, the probability algorithms of Quantum Mechanics are "complex functional information". Are these formulas or motions designed ?
The fact is your definition commits the "post hoc" and "regression" fallacies.
You actually blew your wadd for ANY credibility when you said the universe was chaotic, and there was no reason to see the order which is observed.
Answer ALL the questions. Every question which remains unanswered demonstrates the falsehood of the ID nonsense.
Look up the words complex, functional, and information and put it together.
Um .... no. You already did that and it came up with a big nothing.
You fail again. If you yourself cannot specify EXACTLY how this definition applies to your theory, you have no theory,
and the fact that you can't answer questions, set boundaries, or even discuss the meanings of the words, discuss what is included, and what is excluded,
means ... all you have is hot air.
BTW .... Lee Strobel ..... LMAO. A journalist who interviewed people friendly to his own view. I think we all see the delusional little world you live in.
How about read "The Case Against The Case For Christ". LOL. He's nothing but an ignoramus, (not unlike you) who has NO EXPERTISE in the field he dabbles in as an amateur.
I think he's conned Liberty U into actually paying him for his garbage.
No questions being answered ... why is that ? Can't Jebus send in the smart ones ?
How RNA may have spontaneously formed has been demonstrated in the lab.
https://phys.org/news/2013-12-scientists...r-rna.html
All you have is a "god of the gap" argument, that in general, science does not buy.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist