RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 5, 2018 at 1:04 pm
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2018 at 1:05 pm by Bucky Ball.)
(November 5, 2018 at 12:15 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(November 5, 2018 at 11:58 am)Bucky Ball Wrote: Um .... no. You already did that and it came up with a big nothing.
You fail again. If you yourself cannot specify EXACTLY how this definition applies to your theory, you have no theory,
and the fact that you can't answer questions, set boundaries, or even discuss the meanings of the words, discuss what is included, and what is excluded,
means ... all you have is hot air.
BTW .... Lee Strobel ..... LMAO. A journalist who interviewed people friendly to his own view. I think we all see the delusional little world you live in.
How about read "The Case Against The Case For Christ". LOL. He's nothing but an ignoramus, (not unlike you) who has NO EXPERTISE in the field he dabbles in as an amateur.
I think he's conned Liberty U into actually paying him for his garbage.
No questions being answered ... why is that ? Can't Jebus send in the smart ones ?
How RNA may have spontaneously formed has been demonstrated in the lab.
https://phys.org/news/2013-12-scientists...r-rna.html
All you have is a "god of the gap" argument, that in general, science does not buy.
No serious person can argue against the information argument. It is too strong of a case for a Creator.
Of course, try to attack the source of the book and movie.
Nothing but your unsupported opinion.
In saying "no serious person" YOU are doing the very thing you whine about.
Scientists in general do not buy this crap, therefore you are saying that most scientists are not serious. (LOL)
YOU cannot support the information argument ... all you can do is make unsupported assertions about it, and you are unable to answer questions about it, to clarify it.
It's not even an argument. It's an attempted argument based on equivocating the word "information" ... when in fact it's all nothing but chemistry, (which neither you nor Strobel understand ... even the basics of). Base pairs are not "information".
The Case for A Creator has been thoroughly debunked.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightat...a-creator/
You think we were all born yesterday ?
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist