DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

No serious person can argue against the information argument.  It is too strong of a case for a Creator.

Of course, try to attack the source of the book and movie.

Nothing but your unsupported opinion.
In saying "no serious person" YOU are doing the very thing you whine about.
Scientists in general do not buy this crap, therefore you are saying that most scientists are not serious. (LOL)

YOU cannot support the information argument ... all you can do is make unsupported assertions about it, and you are unable to answer questions about it, to clarify it.
It's not even an argument. It's an attempted argument based on equivocating the word "information" ... when in fact it's all nothing but chemistry, (which neither you nor Strobel understand ... even the basics of). Base pairs are not "information".

The Case for A Creator has been thoroughly debunked.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightat...a-creator/

You think we were all born yesterday ?

It is not just the chemistry as you put it.  It doesn't matter what the material is.  What matters is the order of the information (which encodes for proteins).  Francis Crick figured this out 61 years ago in 1957.  DNA was discovered in 1953 and the information was determined to be functional like this in 1957.  Francis Crick was a cryptographer and he cracked the greatest code of all.