DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Bucky Ball]

Nothing but your unsupported opinion.
In saying "no serious person" YOU are doing the very thing you whine about.
Scientists in general do not buy this crap, therefore you are saying that most scientists are not serious. (LOL)

YOU cannot support the information argument ... all you can do is make unsupported assertions about it, and you are unable to answer questions about it, to clarify it.
It's not even an argument. It's an attempted argument based on equivocating the word "information" ... when in fact it's all nothing but chemistry, (which neither you nor Strobel understand ... even the basics of). Base pairs are not "information".

The Case for A Creator has been thoroughly debunked.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/daylightat...a-creator/

You think we were all born yesterday ?

It is not just the chemistry as you put it.  It doesn't matter what the material is.  What matters is the order of the information (which encodes for proteins).  Francis and Crick figured this out 61 years ago in 1957.  DNA was discovered in 1953 and the information was determined to be functional like this in 1957.

It is all only chemistry. The reason the base pairs are attracted is nothing but opposite charged particles, (as in all of chemistry, of which you are totally ignorant), AND that is the reason the proteins are formed on the template. It matters 110 % "what the material is" They are charged atomic particles .... your ignorance is astounding. No wonder you are left to the likes of Lee Strobel to find your non-answers. The order of the base pairs does matter, (duh), but only chemically. It's the REASON why small defects in the chemistry an have such profound effects on health. You *really* need a science class, (or 3).

https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/a...etter-time

https://science-explained.com/theory/dna...d-protein/