At work.
So, all that seems to be forth coming now is/are simply repeated assertions.
No explanations to questions seeking further expansion upon other questions asked.
Such as: Why does terrestrial DNA use a 'Pentose' (5-sided) sugar backbone when 'Hexonucleic acid' (6-sided) is quite do-able/possible?
Instead of a cardohydrate sugar why isn't an amino acid chain (Peptide backbone) used? It's more structurally stable and robust at higher temperatures. (Terrestrial DNA falls apart above temperatures of 21.3' C [71' F] )
All CDF47 can seem to do is reply "Nuh-uh! Goddidit!"
So, all that seems to be forth coming now is/are simply repeated assertions.
No explanations to questions seeking further expansion upon other questions asked.
Such as: Why does terrestrial DNA use a 'Pentose' (5-sided) sugar backbone when 'Hexonucleic acid' (6-sided) is quite do-able/possible?
Instead of a cardohydrate sugar why isn't an amino acid chain (Peptide backbone) used? It's more structurally stable and robust at higher temperatures. (Terrestrial DNA falls apart above temperatures of 21.3' C [71' F] )
All CDF47 can seem to do is reply "Nuh-uh! Goddidit!"
