Subjective Morality?

[Angrboda]

.............................................................................?

40 pages, Benny...40 pages.  It's useless to keep hitting the reset every time you get your questions answered, every time you have an example presented.

This is your normal strategy, bub, and I'm on to you.

You haven't yet provided any satisfactory description of a moral fact, nor really defined anything accurately, nor explained where you think ideas about "ought" originate.  But once the thread gets deep enough, you'll claim to have done it all inside-out, upside-down, and backward, despite having done very little but paraphrase a couple wikipedia pages.

Been through this process before, na?

Are you going to provide any good examples, or are you not?

Nobody needs to provide you a damn thing, benny. You keep going on about this when even if we aren't able to provide an example that meets with your approval, it doesn't prove a damn thing one way or the other. You're just being a disingenuous twat and trying to deflect from your inability to demonstrate that morality is subjective. I provided an example, that rape is wrong. You in all your cluelessness simply didn't understand the point I was making. That rape is objectively wrong may be true, unless and until you show that it is not. I'm not the one claiming something, you are. So get to work and demonstrate that morality is predicated upon feelings and not predicated upon an objective truth. So far you haven't done squat but piss and moan about irrelevant shit and deflect.