(November 14, 2018 at 5:58 am)Everena Wrote:I didnt say you denied it, i just said you are ignorant (of which there is a mountain of evidence in this thread), which is a factual statement.(November 14, 2018 at 5:39 am)Deesse23 Wrote: Mules werent created. Mules are a crossbreed from horse/ass and are infertile. Ergo this "species" wouldnt be able to survive in nature.We are breeding them. That they cant produce offspring also supports the theory of evolution (*waves at ignorant Eve*).
Everena: It's pronouced Eh-vuh or Eh-vuh-renn-uh. And I am not denying evolution, just saying that there is very little evidence to support one species "turning into" an entirely different species. Almost no evidence, lots of conjecture and speculation. Lots and lots of evidence of adaption however, which is part of the theory of evol
Just sayin´
Please define what an "entirely different" species is, which evolution cant provide, and what a "non-entirely different species is" which evolution can provide. I agree that horses and asses arent much different, but i am not the one claming that there is a "threshold" of being so different that evolution cant happen and "goddidit".
Lets stick with hoofed animals like horses and asses: What can evolution turn them into and what not, or in reverse: From what can they originate and from what not.
Thx.
Cetero censeo religionem delendam esse