(November 14, 2018 at 6:17 pm)Khemikal Wrote: LOL. It's funny because you think that no evidence for moral realism has been provided. What's become painfully clear is that you just didn't know what moral realism was going into this.
Oh, there's plenty of evidence for moral realism-- you keep talking about it, and I don't think you are making it up. What there is zero evidence of is that moral realism is right. You claim it's based on objective moral facts, but cannot demonstrate that any facts are intrinsically moral, or that the plain old fact facts you choose to consider morally and thereby dub "moral facts" arrive at anything more than an arbitrary (read: subjective) position.