RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 14, 2018 at 7:19 pm
(This post was last modified: November 14, 2018 at 7:21 pm by Everena.)
(November 14, 2018 at 7:16 pm)Bucky Ball Wrote: Total bullshit from you, as usual.
The definition of species is VERY precise, and in fact you have refuted NOTHING I presented.
You are actually not even competent to comment on anything, as you have clearly demonstrated you are totally ignorant of Evolution, and how it works.
Nice try at deflection from the fact you have been refuted. Totally.
Now run along and play, sweetie. If you're a good girl, you can have some Tasty Plants, designed just for you.
Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.
(November 14, 2018 at 7:18 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote:Everena: Not friggin plants. actual species with conscious life.(November 14, 2018 at 7:06 pm)Everena Wrote: I am already the diamond. You're the turds and good luck turds.
Everena: So show me one where the new species was something they could not mate with and I'll believe you.
Quote:In the early 1900s, three species of these wildflowers - the western salsify (
T. dubius), the meadow salsify (T. pratensis), and the oyster plant (T. porrifolius) - were introduced to the United States from Europe. As their populations expanded, the species interacted, often producing sterile hybrids. But by the 1950s, scientists realized that there were two new variations of goatsbeard growing. While they looked like hybrids, they weren't sterile. They were perfectly capable of reproducing with their own kind but not with any of the original three species - the classic definition of a new species.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/sci...ervations/
Gee, that was tough.