Dear Everena, your heart is in the right place, but your reasoning so far is not that strong. Ad-populum is weak, your way of refuting of evolution not strong, - but there is good arguments for God and arguments from scientific evidence with reasoning pointing to design.
Equip yourself and argue by what is best, which means clear proofs, and not ambiguity or conjecture. If you argue with the latter, it's put you on the same reliance of Atheists, they rely on conjecture.
And regarding religion, you are to assess it, and see if there is clear proofs for religion or a religion or not. Don't go this I am going to make reality and God what I wish him to be and everyone else then me is deluded type, because you will be closer to Atheists in that respect, then those who are following the truth and guidance, and building on clear proofs as foundations and keep building their path on clear signs and clear light and insights from God.
Equip yourself and argue by what is best, which means clear proofs, and not ambiguity or conjecture. If you argue with the latter, it's put you on the same reliance of Atheists, they rely on conjecture.
And regarding religion, you are to assess it, and see if there is clear proofs for religion or a religion or not. Don't go this I am going to make reality and God what I wish him to be and everyone else then me is deluded type, because you will be closer to Atheists in that respect, then those who are following the truth and guidance, and building on clear proofs as foundations and keep building their path on clear signs and clear light and insights from God.
