RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 16, 2018 at 7:28 pm
(This post was last modified: November 16, 2018 at 7:28 pm by Angrboda.)
(November 16, 2018 at 7:23 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(November 16, 2018 at 7:00 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Shannon information is anything but dumb. Anyway, that's hardly a technical distinction. DNA is complex, I will grant you that, but as we have discussed before, the idea that it is 'specified' is a load of bollocks as specification as it applies to information has no coherent definition, and no one, including Dembski himself, can demonstrate that any one thing is or is not specified. Nor additionally, is the concept in any practical application being used, nor has it ever been. I don't think you understand the first thing about Shannon information or any other kind of information. But feel free to prove me wrong. Give me a workable definition of specified information. Feel free to get as technical as you like. We've been over this very subject once already, and you're repeating something you've already been refuted on and are simply being dishonest.
How am I being dishonest, LOL. If you know something I don't know so be it, state it here. I've already provided definitions in this thread, not going to repeat that.
Then link to the definitions. I don't believe you provided what you say you've provided, or, at minimum, that they withstood scrutiny. Last I recall, when I challenged you on the matter, you acknowledged the problems but nonetheless continued to make, what in the light of that, was unsupported assertions. But this "I already provided it" nonsense is a convenient trapdoor which you and other theists have used to attempt to dispose of objections they can't handle. You're just following in some very well worn footsteps. If you aren't willing to provide the definitions, then your claims can be dismissed with prejudice.
You are wrong, and your excuses don't change that.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)