DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[CDF47]

How am I being dishonest, LOL.  If you know something I don't know so be it, state it here.  I've already provided definitions in this thread, not going to repeat that.

Then link to the definitions.  I don't believe you provided what you say you've provided, or, at minimum, that they withstood scrutiny.  Last I recall, when I challenged you on the matter, you acknowledged the problems but nonetheless continued to make, what in the light of that, was unsupported assertions.  But this "I already provided it" nonsense is a convenient trapdoor which you and other theists have used to attempt to dispose of objections they can't handle.  You're just following in some very well worn footsteps.  If you aren't willing to provide the definitions, then your claims can be dismissed with prejudice.

You are wrong, and your excuses don't change that.

When something exhibits specified complexity (i.e., is both complex and specified, simultaneously) one can infer that it was produced by an intelligent cause (i.e., that it was designed), rather than being the result of natural processes. The following are examples: "A single letter of the alphabet is specified without being complex. A long sentence of random letters is complex without being specified. A Shakespearean sonnet is both complex and specified. Details of living things can be similarly characterized, especially the "patterns" of molecular sequences in functional biological molecules such as DNA.