(November 17, 2018 at 1:51 am)CDF47 Wrote:(November 17, 2018 at 1:49 am)Jörmungandr Wrote: So, in other words you're backtracking from your claim that the information in DNA is specified and complex and essentially asking me to accept an ipse dixit argument because you can't substantiate those claims.
I'm impressed. Okay, I'm not really impressed.
No, I provided the definitions and you don't like them. Not my problem. The definitions are what they are, like any other word is defined.
No, you provided the definitions and I pointed out how they didn't fulfill the claims you had made, giving detailed reasons why they did not. It had nothing to do with my liking or not liking them. I'm not even sure I know what it would mean to not like a definition other than to say that a definition is wrong, and that I did not do. So, in addition to proving once again that you can't back up your claims about specified complexity, you're showing that you're a terrible and transparent liar, a fact which I'd already indicated.
Put up or shut up. This whining and lying is unbecoming, even for you.
![[Image: extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg]](https://i.postimg.cc/zf86M5L7/extraordinarywoo-sig.jpg)