DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Gwaithmir]

And you can start by proving that God exists. Without a divine designer, your entire hypothesis collapses.

In fairness, I think this may be putting the cart before the horse.  The idea of proof of a designer is evidence of the existence of such a God, even if far from conclusive.  It's true that having evidence or knowledge of the mechanism involved, namely an intelligent, all-powerful agent would enhance the probability that design is true, but we consider hypotheses without plausible mechanisms all the time, from acupuncture to remote viewing.  The lack of a known mechanism is not in itself an absolute bar to discovery.

Remote Viewing and Acupuncture are testable, falsifiable hypotheses. Artificial design in nature is not. I have yet to see a case for Intelligent Design which did not involve some form of special pleading or argument from ignorance.