DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

Can you describe the effect that multiple concurrent trials would have on those numbers?

An intelligent agent would be required for multiple trials to take place because it takes an intelligent consciuos being to administer numerous trials. And the numbers prove it's impossible that it happened by chance.

---

Do you mean when I was 4 years old and pulled out of my body during abuse? Or do you mean when he and I had the mutual/shared experiences? Very unlikely that we would both be delusional at the same time and even if we were, it is even more unlikely that we would have the exact same delusion. And that is not even what has me totally convinced, although it got me 90% of the way towards knowing. The other 40 plus unexplainable signs pushed me to 100% and these are not things that can even be delusions. Some force grabbed my steering wheel and pulled me back on the road when my car drifted into oncoming traffic and saved me from a head on collision with a truck. I have had dreams that I wrote down and years later the things I had dreamed actually happened. When my mom was dying of cancer, a presense woke me up at 4:02 am the morning she died  and I found out later that day that that was exactly the time she passed away. I do know none of these were delusions and I also know none of the signs were delusions.

I will add, as a side note, while not directly the answer to the question I asked, your answer does seem an attempt to answer my prior request for inexplicable and improbable experiences that you have had.  While I appreciate your sincerity, the list you have provided so far is laughably explicable in mundane terms and leads me to the conclusion that, if the rest of the experiences which you think are inexplicable or improbable are of a similar character, your interpretation of these events is more strongly influenced by what you want to believe than it is justified by the facts of what you have experienced.  Thus recalling my earlier point that if your experiences are not so inexplicable as you say, or that there are more probable explanations for your experiences than that which you embrace, then you are simply being irrational and your conclusions as such, are demonstrably unreliable and can be dismissed on that account.  The Humean objection to miracle accounts seems particularly relevant here, though I would be the first to say that the problem may not be as simple as Hume surmised.

Yeah yeah whatever.No one in the entire world gives a fuck what atheists say about their experiences. You are only deluding yourselves, and I do mean that literally. Go ahead and tell it to yourself though if it makes you happy.