DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Abaddon_ire]

DNA works or operates in the particular way that it does because of the laws of nature.  The same with the wind.  Yet you consider one specified and the other not.  Obviously there is more to function or specification than this or else the notion of function or specification is essentially vacuous and useless for distinguishing designed things from things that weren't designed.  As to the 'proper' way of working or operating, that is a judgement as to its fitness for a particular purpose, or a comment upon someone's subjective valuation of said working or operation.  The first is a teleological appeal and so cannot serve the function of distinguishing designed from non-designed thing, because, as noted, it is not a property of the thing itself, but rather a characteristic of some agent reflecting upon said thing.  The latter does not suffice for similar reasons.  So in the first case, function does not separate design from non-design, so if specification is based upon it, then specification does not distinguish design from non-design.  In the second case, function doesn't distinguish design from non-design because it's not even about the thing itself, so if specification is that, then it can't possibly be the basis of determining design from non-design.

So, in other words, if that is the definition of function you indeed were using, or that you believe that someone else whose opinion you were relying on was using, then you or said person obviously didn't know what they were talking about, as things cannot be distinguished on that basis with reference to the things and their properties themselves.  That's a big fail.

Try again.

DNA basically operates like machine code.  Regardless of what you think of the definitions of three particular words there is no way the code wrote itself.

Stop repeating that lie. DNA is nothing like machine code. Are you so thick that I have to go through it yet again?