Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 2, 2025, 8:17 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Make the "civil" discussion part of the forum invisible to non members
#50
RE: Make the "civil" discussion part of the forum invisible to non members
(November 18, 2018 at 4:57 pm)J a c k Wrote: I don’t think it’s ridiculous. I get it. It’s messy. You’re about to click on a thread, then there it is. It’s the one you’re not a member of. Never mind. You have to be looking twice. It’s annoying.

Another good solution to this would be to make threads from that section come up in a different color, like pink.

(November 18, 2018 at 5:21 pm)Wololo Wrote:
(November 18, 2018 at 4:46 pm)LadyForCamus Wrote: I get where you’re coming from, but I can’t help but think this is going to level the playing field in a very revealing way. Some theists in this group are better at civility than others, and some of them tend to resort to insults when their points are refuted.  So, now EVEYONE has to play by the same rules.  Theists have to keep it civil and actually address the rebuttal if and when someone proves a point of theirs wrong, and Atheists have to follow by these same rules as well, so noone can cry, “the atheists didn’t want to talk; they were just mean to me!”  I think it’s going to be interesting, if nothing else.

Edit: Just to clarify, I didn’t mean that the people who object to the subforum itself are being snowflakes.  Valid points have been made on both sides of the argument.  I am talking about the people who want it hidden from the forum at large because they don’t even want to have to see it.  I think that’s a bit ridiculous, frankly.

The wanktards are already trying to control the rules over there. It is blatantly apparent that the likes of wooters, am, a theist or cl wanted that section not to have polite debate, but to control what could be debated, how it could be debated and what refutations the opposition could use.

You're right! That is exactly what I want. Thanks hon! Smile
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly." 

-walsh
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Make the "civil" discussion part of the forum invisible to non members - by Catholic_Lady - November 18, 2018 at 5:53 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A request to delete my posts in the members photo thread WinterHold 30 6673 July 1, 2020 at 12:03 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  Happy Birthday to Banned Members? Jehanne 5 1602 May 20, 2020 at 6:53 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Civil/ safe option for threads. Mystic 2 1273 November 19, 2018 at 10:25 pm
Last Post: SteelCurtain
  Is this trolling on my part? Catholic_Lady 27 4809 November 19, 2018 at 5:18 pm
Last Post: Shell B
  What happened to the "Civil Discussion" thread? Angrboda 48 9852 November 19, 2018 at 9:13 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Please Make This Thread a Sticky in the Philosophy Forum Rhondazvous 1 1351 March 10, 2017 at 10:30 am
Last Post: Rhondazvous
  The CJIS thread appears to be non functioning brewer 13 2127 February 24, 2017 at 11:40 am
Last Post: Shell B
  blocking ex staff members Catholic_Lady 68 9188 November 17, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  Members referred? Catholic_Lady 10 2326 April 6, 2016 at 7:50 am
Last Post: Whateverist
  top posts, top members ?? vorlon13 41 7889 October 6, 2015 at 11:12 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)