RE: Evidence for a god. Do you have any? Simplified arguments version.
November 20, 2018 at 10:31 am
(This post was last modified: November 20, 2018 at 10:32 am by Mister Agenda.)
(October 12, 2018 at 6:11 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Your identity is interlinked with perception and requires it (whether brain generates or something else).
OK, that seems reasonable.
(October 12, 2018 at 6:11 am)MysticKnight Wrote: You have an exact valued identity.
I suppose I do, at least I value it, and while it may be a little fuzzy, at least it is specific to me.
(October 12, 2018 at 6:11 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Nothing can see you exactly are you are but God.
If there were a God and it is omniscient, that would follow. Any omniscient being would be able to perceive me exactly as I am.
(October 12, 2018 at 6:11 am)MysticKnight Wrote: Therefore God exists.
But this in no way follows from any of your premises. Just because you make a series of true statements does not mean your conclusion follows.
I can see.
I can see because I have eyes.
Only a being with eyes can see me.
A being with eyes a million times more acute than mine could see me a million times better.
Therefore there must be a being with eyes a million times more acute than mine.
My conclusion is a non sequitur, it does not follow from the premises. And your conclusion is also a non sequitur.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
