Actually Woo Princess the crap you posted from Feser IN NO WAY addresses the science Krauss has written about.
His criticism is about Krauss saying his approach is as an atheist ... then he uses a really stupid "checkers" business to further muddy the waters.
He never ONCE addresses Kraus' science ... not once.
Never once is his science itself actually criticized ... so here we have LIE #3, you saying an article says something it doesn't.
Please tell us who in the 1930's was discussing quantum foam ?
Put up or shut up.
His criticism is about Krauss saying his approach is as an atheist ... then he uses a really stupid "checkers" business to further muddy the waters.
He never ONCE addresses Kraus' science ... not once.
Never once is his science itself actually criticized ... so here we have LIE #3, you saying an article says something it doesn't.
Please tell us who in the 1930's was discussing quantum foam ?
Put up or shut up.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist
