RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 23, 2018 at 12:26 am
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2018 at 12:44 am by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:Everena
Wrong. They have the only theory that has ever even been partially proven and corroborated. Neuroscientists agree with all proven science. And you know nothing about the theory that I have been following for 20 years, so stop pretending that you do. And microtubules were always the key to proving it all. And they have done that.
There is no such thing in science, (ignorant Woo Princess), as "partially proven".
There is NOT ONE neuro-scientist you can name that buys into this stupid woo.
Quantum reactions in micro tubules proves NOTHING about your woo.
They have "done" nothing. They have no evidence of a "soul" in micro tubules. It's so laughable, it is beyond laughable.
There is no evidence in neuro-science that consciousness can be reduced to micro tubules.
Penrose's specialty is Relativity. He is incompetent in neuro-science. There are countless "debunkings" of this rubbish, all over the internet.
You wasted 20 years on this crap ?
"Microtubules are a structure in the cytoskeleton that are found in all dividing eukaryotic cells and in most differentiated cell types (Desai & Mitchison, 1997). They are by no means exclusive to neurons, so if you think they bestow consciousness then you have to grant consciousness to all eukaryotes (something that most philosophers would find strange), or you are back at the same difficulty as before in trying to explain how networks of microtubules give rise to consciousness and thus postulating them as your basic units instead of neurons gives you no explanatory power."
http://www.quora.com/Has-the-Penrose-hyp...n-debunked
LMFAO
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist