DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

Everena
Wrong. They have the only theory that has ever even been partially proven and corroborated. Neuroscientists agree with all proven science. And you know nothing about the theory that I have been following for 20 years, so stop pretending that you do. And microtubules were always the key to proving it all. And they have done that.

There is no such thing in science, (ignorant Woo Princess), as "partially proven". 
There is NOT ONE neuro-scientist you can name that buys into this stupid woo. 
Quantum reactions in micro tubules proves NOTHING about your woo. 
They have "done" nothing. They have no evidence of a "soul" in micro tubules. It's so laughable, it is beyond laughable. 
There is no evidence in neuro-science that consciousness can be reduced to micro tubules. 
Penrose's specialty is Relativity. He is incompetent in neuro-science. There are countless "debunkings" of this rubbish, all over the internet. 
You wasted 20 years on this crap ? 

"Microtubules are a structure in the cytoskeleton that are found in all dividing eukaryotic cells and in most differentiated cell types (Desai & Mitchison, 1997). They are by no means exclusive to neurons, so if you think they bestow consciousness then you have to grant consciousness to all eukaryotes (something that most philosophers would find strange), or you are back at the same difficulty as before in trying to explain how networks of microtubules give rise to consciousness and thus postulating them as your basic units instead of neurons gives you no explanatory power."

http://www.quora.com/Has-the-Penrose-hyp...n-debunked

LMFAO

I know what microtubules are and I know why they are the key to this theory. You know nothing and sound like the ignorant uneducated blathering fool that you are. You never bother to find out what the actual facts are, and I am just forced to prove you wrong over and over again after you've once again spewed some ignorant crap. And didn't we already have this argument? Anyway, you lose. The only time any scientist doubted them was prior to them proving this incredibly important part of their theory in 2014. 
And yes, you can partially prove a theory when you have 20 testable predictions and you are able to prove 6 of them as they have. The other 14 predictions are still hypothesis, but NONE are refuted by anyone. Maybe you should learn to read and stop pretending you know anything. https://phys.org/news/2014-01-discovery-...rates.html Oh and Happy Thanksgiving!