DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Anomalocaris]

Because you are you, the only thing you should be able to be sure of is you are wrong.

---

Oh, the irony.


You mean learn to read a for profit site that collects and aggregates press releases whatever the source as the fount of received truth,  and not from published, peer reviewed, and cited professional literature?

Oh, no need to thank us for giving you any hints of reality.  You are totally incapable of profiting from it.

Oh just keep on laughing, like the ignorant uneducated fools that you are. This is for you too Bucky Ball.

Here's a .gov link about it

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4594572/

Here's another link saying the exact same thing:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...085105.htm

And here's another link saying the exact same thing again

https://www.journals.elsevier.com/physic...vibrations

And here is another link about it 
https://www.scribd.com/document/31829521...sciousness

And here's another link about it
https://www.quora.com/As-of-yet-is-there...t-Hameroff

Get it yet fool? They proved the most important part of their theory.

Having been instructed that news aggregators are not authoritative, you answer with another 4 news aggregators?   Really?

Are you truly so dumb that you can not grasp the concept that quality is everything, quantity without quality is nothing?   You really being that dumb would neatly explain your persistent moronic fixation with the ad populum (look it up) “93% agrees with me”.  

But let’s see what these sources do say, shall we?   We would be doing your towering ignorance and dishonesty a grave disservice if we were to allow the mistaken impression to form that argumentum ad populum is your main or only customary fallacy.

Let’s look at your .gov article:

“This is by taking the Orch OR (Orchestrated Objective Reduction) hypothesis of Hameroff and Penrose1 as a starting point. The Orch OR hypothesis, which is based in quantum physics, proposes that, when a sufficient mass of tubulin molecules has assembled into cytoskeletal microtubules (MTs) within neuronal cells of the brain, these structures become sites of quantum computation and of quantum state reduction (OR) events resulting in moments of protoconsciousness.”

Ergo: if the theory can hold any shit without leaking, then when tubulin molecules are dispersed, or nonexistent, there is no microtube structure, there is no quantum computing, there is no protoconsciousness.   i.e.  when your brain’s physics structure didn’t exist, or is destroyed, there is no consciousness.  Proto, or otherwise.  No conscious soul before the formation of your nervous system, no conscious soul after the destruction of your nervous system.

So, even if a fringe theory, 14 of whose 20 predictions are admitted to be unproven, is accepted, somehow, as a sound basis upon which to build an entire world view,  it supports no world view such as those you might be capable of propounding.    

So, your intellectual dishonesty is so crass that you would cite articles, whatever their quality and the solidity of their basis, as support which say the exact opposite of what you, by claiming them as support, imply they say.