RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 23, 2018 at 6:47 pm
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2018 at 7:21 pm by Everena.)
(November 23, 2018 at 5:52 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:Their original goal of replicating C elegans as a virtual organism was a complete flop, and they have tried to justify some of their spending by uploading it's synthetic brain into a lego robot, and all it did was crash into a wall. So now all they have is some stupid computer simulation model of the worm, billions and billions of dollars later.(November 23, 2018 at 5:43 pm)Everena Wrote: http://www.artificialbrains.com/openworm#news
Yes, thank you, but I don't see either of your claims that I am interested in confirmed in the page you linked me with. You claimed that projects such as OpenWorm were the original impetus for and substance of the view that the brain is a material process. You also claimed that the simulated c. elegans just sits there. A claim I'm already finding statements contrary to your assertion regarding. Please provide a citation(s) that support those claims. The one you supplied does not appear to do so. Am I overlooking a specific part of that page? If so, please supply us with the relevant quote from the article.
Here is some more information regarding the AI project, but what I linked you initially was their own website.
https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/art...gone-awry/
https://ideas.ted.com/the-fascinatingly-...tual-worm/
