RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 23, 2018 at 7:46 pm
(This post was last modified: November 23, 2018 at 8:16 pm by Bucky Ball.)
Quote:You are a science denier. You have been provided all the material over and over again and because it does not fit your illogical and twisted worldview that is based on science that you clearly don't even understand, you just ignore facts. Penrose and Hameroff have several neuorscientists on their team so you are just full of shit about that too. And your article contains nothing but an unproven hypothesis. I am talking about a globally accepted, partially proven and corroborated theory. Use a dictionary if any of the words I have used confuse you.
Bla bla bla ... LOLOLOL I'm a woo-science denier, Woo Princess. Your theory is bullshit. It's not science. There is no known source for the information to be "transmitted" (received) from .... AND once again, the Woo Princess, instead of addressing the actual science, deflects and talks around the subject. There is NO "universally accepted" anything for these quacks. You cannot name the neuro-scientists on the team, or any other major teams who accept this garbage or are working on it. NOT ONE reference. You're lying. Actually you're SO ignorant, you're *not even* lying. What a giant JOKE.
BTW, the person who employed the ad populum fallacy throughout her posts, really should not be talking about others being illogical.
There are hundreds, if not thousands or millions of crack-pot religionists who have claimed the most bizarre experiences, ALL just as convinced THEIR experiences prove their nonsense in JUST the same way as Everena.
http://www.unexplainedstuff.com/Religiou...gures.html
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell 
Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist