DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Angrboda]

I won't pretend that I know enough about the experiment to call it a flop.  That you have no hesitation in doing so may simply reflect your lack of understanding of the issue.  Describing it as a flop is your word, and you appear to be a dumbass,

Everena: I could say the same of you. And you obviously have reading comp issues. You're also one of those who thinks evolution created everything on our planet right? LOL

so I'm not inclined to put a lot of stock in it unless you can document someone who actually does possess the requisite expertise and who also describes it as a flop.  You claimed that the model, upon being activated, just sat there.  A claim which appears clearly false.

Everena: No, it is pretty obviously true, since they had to go from virtual worm to putting just the brain in a motorized lego robot. Don't you think they would have mentioned if it was a success? And not needed to put part of it in a motorized robot to get it to do something.. anything? Just think about it for a minute......


 That you are not particularly adept at reasoning is not a particularly troubling failing.  That you can't even complete the rather rudimentary task of documenting actual support for your claims is somewhat troubling.

Everena: I really thought you would just figure it out from what I linked you....My mistake.


 If you're not basing your claims upon the things you are reading, I have to wonder exactly what it is you are basing them on.

Everena: I read about all this years ago when it happened.

 The only obvious conclusion is that the supposed "facts" and claims you spout have their origin largely within your imagination, and that there is a significant disconnect between your brain and reality.  Are you sure that you, too, do not have a psychotic disorder?

Everena: Yes, I am quite sure. 

Please explain to me how hitting a wall and then moving away is even remotely similar to simply sitting there and doing nothing? Another commenter states, "the worm sim performs a highly realistic worm-like motion" (here). How are either of these things like what you said? I appreciate that you may be basing your earlier comments on readings long ago, but reading the material you cited was not long ago, and you cited material which not only didn't support your claim but actually contradicted it. Why did you continue to post and implicitly claim that these were support for your claim when you were clearly wrong? Why didn't you amend your claim to agree with that information? Are you really this stupid?

By the way, you still have yet to provide a satisfactory answer to the question of how you know that you are not deluded.