DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

Please explain to me how hitting a wall and then moving away is even remotely similar to simply sitting there and doing nothing?  Another commenter states, "the worm sim performs a highly realistic worm-like motion" (here).  How are either of these things like what you said?  I appreciate that you may be basing your earlier comments on readings long ago, but reading the material you cited was not long ago, and you cited material which not only didn't support your claim but actually contradicted it.  Why did you continue to post and implicitly claim that these were support for your claim when you were clearly wrong?  Why didn't you amend your claim to agree with that information?  Are you really this stupid?

By the way, you still have yet to provide a satisfactory answer to the question of how you know that you are not deluded.

To answer your last question first, the same way the rest of the sane world does. We just know. We have, clear rational minds. And we don't ask dark and ridiculous questions like that to people over and over again either in sane world.

The project and the billions of dollars were invested in building a virtual worm. Not on taking apart a virtual worm that did nothing and removing just the brain then sticking it on a motorized lego robot, but on creating an actual virtual worm. And yes the stupid computer simulation that they have it on now is even doing tricks, but it is only because they made it into an integrative simulation, not a "four dimensional simulation of a biological system" that exists on it's own like they initially set out to do.

Here: Maybe you will get it now if you read all this. I attached the article.

Distinguished computer scientist David Harel called the task
of creating a four-dimensional simulation of a biological system
that is “true to all known facts” a grand challenge of computing
While building a perfect simulation of C. elegans is
not feasible, nonetheless an integrative simulation based on what
is currently known could help further define and choose between
competing hypotheses, help generate new experimentally testable
predictions, and expose gaps in our knowledge.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication...is_elegans

---

Reflexes yes.




They've seen this happen under the microscope. For some one so interested in this I wonder why you no know this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avoidance_reaction

---

That is true. 
However what you think is the truth isn't.

And again she shows no understanding of scientific definitions and tries to replace it with woo mental masturbation

No, I apply the logic that makes it very apparent and obvious that intelligence had to be involved in the creation of life, regardless of what it's doing. If I am the woo princess, you are all the illogical fools of the universe.

---

Everena
What a bunch of whiny babies you all are. You can dish it out, but you sure can't take it.

You should look in the mirror and sing that to yourself. Maybe you'll figure some stuff out.....

---

Please explain to me how hitting a wall and then moving away is even remotely similar to simply sitting there and doing nothing?  Another commenter states, "the worm sim performs a highly realistic worm-like motion" (here).  How are either of these things like what you said?  I appreciate that you may be basing your earlier comments on readings long ago, but reading the material you cited was not long ago, and you cited material which not only didn't support your claim but actually contradicted it.  Why did you continue to post and implicitly claim that these were support for your claim when you were clearly wrong?  Why didn't you amend your claim to agree with that information?  Are you really this stupid?

So she states a bunch of ignorant straw men and continues to cite things that don't support her position all the while failing at the quoting function 

False. I know how to quote now and I do it sometimes, but sometimes it seems like it will come out better and easier to read the other way.