RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 24, 2018 at 4:04 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2018 at 4:05 pm by Everena.)
[quote='Bucky Ball' pid='1857590' dateline='1543088615']
Nothing in Everena's crackpot "theory" has been *partially proven*. There is NOTHING AT ALL in any of the links to consciousness being "received".
Quantum reactions in micro tubules proves NOTHING.
There are micro tubules in all eukariotic cells, and micro tubules in brains are absolutely no different that the ones in her ass, therefor the physical brain location MUST be the primary mediator.
Any idiot with an IQ of 50 knows that a "receiver" implies a "sender", and NO ONE even hypothesizes what this "sender" is, or could be.
It's *not even* a "theory". Until a sender is identified and proven, it's nothing but hocus-pocus.
It's a piece of shit woo-woo.
BTW, putting up a list of Universities with NO REFERENCES to reasearchers, AND the credentials, and what they are working on EXACTLY is worth nothing. Zero. Zip
Everena: The researchers are listed in the links I sent you and in the portions of the articles that I posted. If you bothered to read anything instead of just running your mouth like an ignorant uneducated idiot, you would understand all of it by now.
Try harder, Woo Princess.
Everyone can see you got nothing.
Everena: They only proved that is was possible. They did not prove that it was what was actually happening. I think you are misunderstanding. The important part about all of it was that they have proven that it is possible. And everyone with a brain got that already.
[quote]
God being the creator of everything in the observable universe and having the highest intelligence to the point of being all-knowing, is capable of doing things that you with your limited human brain cannot possibly even fathom.
[/quote]
Isn't that special.
You're quite special ... you and your special knowledge.
You forgot one thing ... the evidence.
Post it (and NOT your "logic" *argument*) now or STFU.
Everena: Oh why? Because my logic argument is a complete and utter fail for atheism?
Nothing in Everena's crackpot "theory" has been *partially proven*. There is NOTHING AT ALL in any of the links to consciousness being "received".
Quantum reactions in micro tubules proves NOTHING.
There are micro tubules in all eukariotic cells, and micro tubules in brains are absolutely no different that the ones in her ass, therefor the physical brain location MUST be the primary mediator.
Any idiot with an IQ of 50 knows that a "receiver" implies a "sender", and NO ONE even hypothesizes what this "sender" is, or could be.
It's *not even* a "theory". Until a sender is identified and proven, it's nothing but hocus-pocus.
It's a piece of shit woo-woo.
BTW, putting up a list of Universities with NO REFERENCES to reasearchers, AND the credentials, and what they are working on EXACTLY is worth nothing. Zero. Zip
Everena: The researchers are listed in the links I sent you and in the portions of the articles that I posted. If you bothered to read anything instead of just running your mouth like an ignorant uneducated idiot, you would understand all of it by now.
Try harder, Woo Princess.
Everyone can see you got nothing.
Everena: They only proved that is was possible. They did not prove that it was what was actually happening. I think you are misunderstanding. The important part about all of it was that they have proven that it is possible. And everyone with a brain got that already.
[quote]
God being the creator of everything in the observable universe and having the highest intelligence to the point of being all-knowing, is capable of doing things that you with your limited human brain cannot possibly even fathom.
[/quote]
Isn't that special.
You're quite special ... you and your special knowledge.
You forgot one thing ... the evidence.
Post it (and NOT your "logic" *argument*) now or STFU.
Everena: Oh why? Because my logic argument is a complete and utter fail for atheism?
