RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 24, 2018 at 4:35 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2018 at 4:41 pm by Everena.)
(November 24, 2018 at 4:15 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: OK, you have no anatomy even vaguely resembling what you need to produce or maintain entangled particles. It's like saying you have a skeleton made of neutronium. Prove it? OK, you have neither the ability to produce nor maintain neutronium.
You're the one claiming that Orch-OR is even a hypothesis. You show how the necessary entangled particles could be produced or maintained.
Orch-Or is scientific theory that has been partially proven and corroborated whether any of you atheists like it or not. This may help you understand, since you obviously don't.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...4513001188
You also need to provide cited sources to back up your argument.
(November 24, 2018 at 4:34 pm)Paleophyte Wrote:(November 24, 2018 at 4:28 pm)Everena Wrote: I totally disagree. But if your argument is that we are, computers require an intelligent and conscious creator to exist and to even do anything. So that means you believe in God.
I'll see your unfounded opinion and raise you the entire field of cognitive neuroscience. Your brain is a computer. We build computers in our image.
Everena: That is a total load of crap. Computers cannot do anything even remotely close to what we can do. They do not have consciousness or emotions or a will to live and survive or a love life, etc etc etc etc etc. You are just wrong.
Quote:and even if that were true, guess what? A conscious intelligent creator is necessary for a computer to exist and to function in any meaningful way. So I guess you do believe God then.
Untrue. Evolution and emergent behaviours can account for the human brain without ever having to invoke deities.
Everena: False. Evolution is a process not a first cause.