DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

Theories aren't proven. Not even partially.

Not true. The hypthoses they contain can be proven and corroborated, just as this one has been.

I read your link twice already. As I said before, it's just a review by Penrose and Hamerhoff rehashing old ideas. Find me a paper that shows how entangled particles are created and maintained in microtubules. Without that you have no receiver.

False. You have no idea what type of signal we are even receiving, so you have no valid argument.

OK.

Non-Gaussian Low-Frequency Noise as a Source of Qubit Decoherence

Pairwise Decoherence in Coupled Spin Qubit Networks

Majorana qubit decoherence by quasiparticle poisoning

Everena: Still does not prove what you stated, because you have no idea what our brains (and I think maybe our bodies too) are receiving.

Computers can't do some of the things that we do. Yet. Other things they do much better. This is largely because they are designed rather than being evolved.

And you have no idea how amusing your argument is that your brain has no computational capacity. What do you think 100 Billion neurons are doing up there?

Far more than any computer can or will ever do.

You say that like processes don't cause anything. Processes are just long causal chains.

I said it is not a first cause and it isn't.