DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[Everena]

I look forward to seeing your defense after others' objections.

Explain how something "becomes complex" without a driving force of conscious intelligence. Also, are you all aware of the most recent discovery regarding DNA by scientists at the University of Washington? 


 "Since the genetic code was deciphered in the 1960s, scientists have assumed that it was used exclusively to write information about proteins. UW scientists were stunned to discover that genomes use the genetic code to write two separate languages. One describes how proteins are made, and the other instructs the cell on how genes are controlled. One language is written on top of the other, which is why the second language remained hidden for so long.
“For over 40 years we have assumed that DNA changes affecting the genetic code solely impact how proteins are made,” said Stamatoyannopoulos. “Now we know that this basic assumption about reading the human genome missed half of the picture. These new findings highlight that DNA is an incredibly powerful information storage device, which nature has fully exploited in unexpected ways.”
The genetic code uses a 64-letter alphabet called codons. The UW team discovered that some codons, which they called duons, can have two meanings, one related to protein sequence, and one related to gene control. These two meanings seem to have evolved in concert with each other. The gene control instructions appear to help stabilize certain beneficial features of proteins and how they are made.

---

No one ever responded to this question and I posted it twice.

---

[quote='Everena' pid='1845685' dateline='1541884576']
This entire universe and everything in it is evidence of higher intelligence. How and why do we have consciousness? Science doesn't know the answer to that.

Okay suppose that it didn't (it does)

In fact, remove yourself entirely from this situation.  If someone asked us the answer to a complicated math question...and I blurted out "42!" ...and I am wrong..the next guy...who blurts out "43!" isn't right on account of how I didn't know the answer to the question.

That, is what's known as an argument from ignorance.  The idea that because someone else doesn't know something, whatever you happen to say must be true.  It may be true that someone doesn't know something...but regardless..that won't mean that someone else does.

You're welcome.

Here's the second example of when I proved one you wrong, and he continued to argue this with me even though i had proven him wrong twice. Science does not yet have an explanation for how or why we are conscious. All science can do so far is pin point where in the brain we are experiencing consciousness, not how our conscious self awareness comes to be. There are only guesses, and neuroscientists all over the world are working on different hypotheses, but nothing has been proven.

---

So now, scientifically, ladies and gentlemen, plants and animals and other forms of life will be classified by what section they are in, in the supermarket.

Proving to atheists how wrong they are about literally almost everything? Absolutely it's what God wants!