At work.
What?
You quite readily redefine words and meanings simply to suit your fluffy feels.
You repeatedly post words then, when questioned for clarification or explanation, either ignore and ask for more of (usually) something else.
Or else run off and gather a popualrist book or other pamphlet to wave about such as if to garner some secretly agreed upon, though quite mysterious and perplexing, points....
Sometimes, of which, said compilations hail from as far away as the previous century.
It would seem that you would insist that only you are allowed to play with the rhetoric tools of prose. All the while insisting we respondants maintain our rigour with certitude and transparent verisimilitude.
I cast my glove down!
Hypocrisy, thy handle carries Everena as its name.
(November 28, 2018 at 12:24 am)Everena Wrote:(November 28, 2018 at 12:07 am)Peebo-Thuhlu Wrote: Hmmmm. It would seem you don't wish to be held to rigour with your word use.Strawman argument. Answer the actual question or admit defeat. And your comment about what? Fungi eating a dead carcass? What does that have to do with anything?
My comment is ignored/dismissed such that you can ask yet another question. The answer to which is quite deep, profound and (Dare I reply with) complicated.
I would first seperate your sentence into;
"Driving force" followed by "Inteligence"
Any driving force can impart its momentum upon another medium.
(Flowery, colourful language on comming)
Streams shape stones.
Oceans shape cliffs.
Winds shape terrain (As well as sculpt trees)
All examples of your first point sheered clear of your inteligence addendum.
Does such poetic discourse meet with your approval?
What?
You quite readily redefine words and meanings simply to suit your fluffy feels.
You repeatedly post words then, when questioned for clarification or explanation, either ignore and ask for more of (usually) something else.
Or else run off and gather a popualrist book or other pamphlet to wave about such as if to garner some secretly agreed upon, though quite mysterious and perplexing, points....
Sometimes, of which, said compilations hail from as far away as the previous century.
It would seem that you would insist that only you are allowed to play with the rhetoric tools of prose. All the while insisting we respondants maintain our rigour with certitude and transparent verisimilitude.
I cast my glove down!
Hypocrisy, thy handle carries Everena as its name.