RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 28, 2018 at 1:44 am
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2018 at 2:25 am by Amarok.)
Need i point out he himself admits he's not qualified
I also point out the majority of his supposed discussions with other scientists is simply hearsay and the papers he cites are just his lack of understanding of the varied driving of mechanism of Macro evolution.
Quote:Assuming that I have something significant to contribute to the evolution vs. creation debate, many ask me to speak and write concerning my thoughts on the topic. However, I do not have anything substantive to say about it. I am a layman on the subject. Although I have read about a half dozen books on the debate, maybe a dozen, and though I can speak authoritatively on complex chemical synthesis, I am not qualified to enter the public discussion on evolution vs. creation. So please don’t ask me to be the speaker or debater at your event, and think carefully about asking me for an interview because I will probably not give you the profound quotations that you seek. You are of course free to quote me from what is written here, but do me the kindness of placing my statements in a fair context.Also he rejects ID
Quote:to those who “are disconcerted or even angered that I signed a statement back in 2001” he responded “I have been labeled as an Intelligent Design (ID) proponent. I am not. I do not know how to use science to prove intelligent design although some others might. I am sympathetic to the arguments on the matter and I find some of them intriguing, but the scientific proof is not there
I also point out the majority of his supposed discussions with other scientists is simply hearsay and the papers he cites are just his lack of understanding of the varied driving of mechanism of Macro evolution.
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb