RE: DNA Proves Existence of a Designer
November 28, 2018 at 7:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 28, 2018 at 7:24 pm by Paleophyte.)
(November 28, 2018 at 7:00 pm)CDF47 Wrote:(November 28, 2018 at 5:56 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: "The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory."
Judge John E. Jones III, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005)
That case was a joke and should have never happened.
What? You mean the perjury by the ID proponents? The judge agrees with you:
"The breathtaking inanity of the Board's decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources."
Judge John E. Jones III, Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District (2005)
(November 28, 2018 at 7:10 pm)Everena Wrote:(November 28, 2018 at 7:00 pm)Paleophyte Wrote: So, that's all the animals that you are claiming are conscious, no?That is what this says, yes
Animals: 7.77 million (12% described)
So you did say that all animals are conscious then. Any time you're ready to apologize for calling me a liar...
Quote:No one's arguing microevolution, like I just said. And yes I know that already, but thanks anyway.
Speciation. That word that I put in giant red letters for you. That means macroevolution. You're citing a paper that describes how macroevolution happens and trying to claim that it says it doesn't. It's like pointing to a duck and saying, "See? I told you so! No birds!"